rtt_ros_integration_??_msgs

Hi everybody,

Included in the orocos_toolchain_ros are the:

rtt_ros_integration_geometry_msgs rtt_ros_integration_nav_msgs rtt_ros_integration_sensor_msgs rtt_ros_integration_std_msgs

All these messages are part of the common_msgs stack.

But, since orocos is very usefull to control hardware, why is diagnostic_msgs not included?

I am aware of the new script to generate these packages, which is very usefull btw, but I was just wondering.

Tim

rtt_ros_integration_??_msgs

2011/8/1 t [dot] t [dot] g [dot] clephas [..] ... <t [dot] t [dot] g [dot] clephas [..] ...>:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Included in the orocos_toolchain_ros are the:
>
> rtt_ros_integration_geometry_msgs
> rtt_ros_integration_nav_msgs
> rtt_ros_integration_sensor_msgs
> rtt_ros_integration_std_msgs
>
> All these messages are part of the common_msgs stack.
>
> But, since orocos is very usefull to control hardware, why is diagnostic_msgs not included?

There is not really a reason for it :). In the meantime, we actually
even added them to the repository, currently in a seperate branch.
They will be available in the orocos_toolchain_ros electric release,
which will also involve some restructuring of the packages in order to
make it more easy for the user (see discussion on orocos-dev about the
refactoring).

Regards,

Steven

>
> I am aware of the new script to generate these packages, which is very usefull btw, but I was just wondering.
>
> Tim
>
>
> --
> Orocos-Users mailing list
> Orocos-Users [..] ...
> http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-users
>