Yes, you're correct.

2013/10/15 Willy Lambert <lambert [dot] willy [..] ...>

> Ok, thanks, so if I want to use an other compilator than gcc I have no way
> to do this currently ?
>
>
> 2013/10/15 Philippe Hamelin <philippe [dot] hamelin [..] ...>
>
>> Hi Willy,
>>
>> these patches were not integrated because the support for ARM
>> architecture is now implemented through the more generic GCC built-in
>> atomic operations (see RTT "oro_gcc" target).
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>> 2013/10/14 Willy Lambert <lambert [dot] willy [..] ...>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Are those patches integrated somewhere ? I was wondering about arm
>>> situation. The sources from 2.6 doesn't contain anything about arm.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/4/7 Philippe Hamelin <philippe [dot] hamelin [..] ...>
>>>
>>>> Here a second patch for the arm port that fix a name clashing with
>>>> boost thread.
>>>>
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2011/4/6 Philippe Hamelin <philippe [dot] hamelin [..] ...>
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> here is a patch to add ARMv6 and ARMv7 (Cortex A8/A9) to
>>>>> RTT. Although this port has only been
>>>>> tested on a single processor architecture (ARM Cortex-A8, ARMv7 instruction
>>>>> set), this port should support ARMv6 architecture and also multi-core SMP
>>>>> architectures (ARM Cortex A9). I will have the opportunity to validate
>>>>> the operation on a Cortex-A9 MPcore in the coming months.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would have liked
>>>>> to incorporate support for older ARM architectures (ARMv5 and
>>>>> under), but unfortunately I had a lot of strange problems (assert,
>>>>> exception, race conditions, etc.) with the arm-port branch
>>>>> that is available in Peter's github account. I really suspect that there
>>>>> is a problem with ARM atomic operations that can be foundin this branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Orocos-Dev mailing list
>>>> Orocos-Dev [..] ...
>>>> http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>