mid-2011, ReferenceDataSource gained a setReference method which made it
very very much look like LateReferenceDataSource.
Am I missing something, or would it be possible to deprecate one of the
two ?
Orocos Real-Time ToolkitSmarter realtime. Safer threads
|
|
ReferenceDataSource vs LateReferenceDataSource |
ReferenceDataSource vs LateReferenceDataSource
2013/3/25 Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain [dot] joyeux [..] ...>:
> mid-2011, ReferenceDataSource gained a setReference method which made it
> very very much look like LateReferenceDataSource.
>
> Am I missing something, or would it be possible to deprecate one of the
> two ?
Yep, it's a dupe. Both are in internal, so we can play as we like.
I'd prefer to keep (Const)ReferenceDataSource, also rttlua uses it too.
We might migrate/inline some of the LateRef methods into this class...
but we can't typedef it.
Other suggestions ?
Peter
ReferenceDataSource vs LateReferenceDataSource
On 03/25/2013 03:09 PM, Peter Soetens wrote:
>
> Yep, it's a dupe. Both are in internal, so we can play as we like.
>
> I'd prefer to keep (Const)ReferenceDataSource, also rttlua uses it too.
I don't mind. We'll just have to update the places where the Late* stuff
is being used.