[Bug 96] ZXXDWH::positionInverse bug during singularity

For more infomation about this bug, visit

Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...> changed:

What |Removed |Added
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
CC| |ruben [dot] smits [..] ...

--- Comment #3 from Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...> 2008-01-18 15:33:10 ---
Very old not used code.

closing bug

[Bug 96] ZXXDWH::positionInverse bug during singularity

For more infomation about this bug, visit

Klaas Gadeyne <klaas [dot] gadeyne [..] ...> changed:

What |Removed |Added
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |klaas [dot] gadeyne [..] ...

--- Comment #4 from Klaas Gadeyne <klaas [dot] gadeyne [..] ...> 2008-01-18 18:00:28 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Very old not used code.

[playing the devils' advocate]
Wouldn't it be better to _remove_ the code then if it's unused?
[/...]

> closing bug
>

Ruben Smits's picture

[Bug 96] ZXXDWH::positionInverse bug during singularity

For more infomation about this bug, visit

--- Comment #5 from Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...> 2008-01-18 20:30:24 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Very old not used code.
>
> [playing the devils' advocate]
> Wouldn't it be better to _remove_ the code then if it's unused?
> [/...]

ok, i should be more clear in my comments,

it should have been:

very old "removed" code

> > closing bug
> >
>