For more infomation about this bug, visit

Peter Soetens
<peter [dot] soetens [..] ...> changed:

What |Removed |Added
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
CC| |peter [dot] soetens [..] ...

--- Comment #1 from Peter Soetens
<peter [dot] soetens [..] ...> 2008-10-09 14:52:38 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Requires addition of "Decompose" property to all existing reporter .cpf files.
> This isn't in the online doc's nor the reporting test cases. Should these be
> updated?
>
> After a new build of OCL, I had to add the following to get my existing .cpf
> files to load. Value of "Decompose" is irrelevant if you are not using NetCDF
> (I believe?)
> S
>
>
> For NetCDF
> 0
>
>

It's not a bug, it's a feature :-). The bug is that it should have been
documented. You could also have used the 'UpdateProperties' property instead of
'PropertyFile' in your deployment xml file for the reporting component.

The property was added to allow the user to choose if the type was passed on as
a whole with operator<< or first decomposed in its primitive values (old
behaviour).

Although the other reporters only produce nice output with the decomposed
method, it is not said that they couldn't do otherwise, so this is not NetCDF
specific.

Peter

On Oct 9, 2008, at 08:10 , S Roderick wrote:

> For more infomation about this bug, visit > >
> Summary: r29583 breaks existing reporting files
> Product: OCL
> Version: trunk
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: All
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P2
> Component: Reporting
> AssignedTo: orocos-dev [..] ...
> ReportedBy: kiwi [dot] net [..] ...
> CC: orocos-dev [..] ...
> Estimated Hours: 0.0
>
> Requires addition of "Decompose" property to all existing
> reporter .cpf files.
> This isn't in the online doc's nor the reporting test cases. Should
> these be
> updated?
>
> After a new build of OCL, I had to add the following to get my
> existing .cpf
> files to load. Value of "Decompose" is irrelevant if you are not
> using NetCDF
> (I believe?)
> S
>
>
> For NetCDF
> 0
>

Actually value needs to be 1 ... if you want the previous behaviour.
Otherwise you get "formatted" data in your log file ... confuses the
hell out of gnuplot ... :-)
S