[Bug 658] New: Web link to KDL source tarball is broken
| Submitted by snrkiwi on Fri, 2009-05-29 21:10 |
https://www.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=658
Summary: Web link to KDL source tarball is broken
Product: KDL
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: Build system
AssignedTo: orocos-dev [..] ...
ReportedBy: kiwi [dot] net [..] ...
CC: orocos-dev [..] ...
Estimated Hours: 0.0
On this page
the link to "KDL 1.0 beta1" is broken. Links to this file
http://people.mech.kuleuven.be/~rsmits/kdl/Orocos-KDL-1.0.0-beta1-Source...
I see a "kdl.tar.bz" file (which doesn't build, BTW) and a "kdl-svn.tarbz" file
(which does build) in that directory.
[Bug 658] Web link to KDL source tarball is broken
https://www.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=658
Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ruben [dot] smits [..] ...en.b
| |e
Resolution| |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...> 2009-06-09 11:16:53 ---
I updated the kdl-source webpage. Only the kdl-svn will still be available. The
tarball should be updated every day.
Ruben
[Bug 658] Web link to KDL source tarball is broken
On Jun 9, 2009, at 05:16 , Ruben Smits wrote:
> https://www.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=658
>
>
> Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |ruben [dot] smits [..] ...en.b
> | |e
> Resolution| |FIXED
> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...>
> 2009-06-09 11:16:53 ---
> I updated the kdl-source webpage. Only the kdl-svn will still be
> available. The
> tarball should be updated every day.
So KDL will no longer have any fixed point releases? v1.0, v2.0, etc.
Stephen
[Bug 658] Web link to KDL source tarball is broken
We will, if the api stabilizes. I recently filled the "dynamics" gap,
so a stable release is on its way.
Ruben
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:16 PM, S Roderick<kiwi [dot] net [..] ...> wrote:
>
> On Jun 9, 2009, at 05:16 , Ruben Smits wrote:
>> https://www.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=658
>>
>>
>> Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...> changed:
>>
>> What |Removed |Added
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> CC| |ruben [dot] smits [..] ...en.b
>> | |e
>> Resolution| |FIXED
>> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- Comment #1 from Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...>
>> 2009-06-09 11:16:53 ---
>> I updated the kdl-source webpage. Only the kdl-svn will still be
>> available. The
>> tarball should be updated every day.
>
> So KDL will no longer have any fixed point releases? v1.0, v2.0, etc.
> Stephen
>
[Bug 658] Web link to KDL source tarball is broken
On Jun 9, 2009, at 08:59 , Ruben Smits wrote:
> We will, if the api stabilizes. I recently filled the "dynamics" gap,
> so a stable release is on its way.
>
> Ruben
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:16 PM, S Roderick<kiwi [dot] net [..] ...> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 05:16 , Ruben Smits wrote:
>>> https://www.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=658
>>>
>>>
>>> Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...> changed:
>>>
>>> What |Removed |Added
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> CC| |ruben [dot] smits [..] ...en.b
>>> | |e
>>> Resolution| |FIXED
>>> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- Comment #1 from Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...>
>>> 2009-06-09 11:16:53 ---
>>> I updated the kdl-source webpage. Only the kdl-svn will still be
>>> available. The
>>> tarball should be updated every day.
>>
>> So KDL will no longer have any fixed point releases? v1.0, v2.0, etc.
>> Stephen
Modifying the tarball everyday invaldiates the checksum for any
package manager. :-(
No chance of doing some kind of fixed point release? IMHO KDL is
pretty damn stable in it's current form, both in terms of API and in
terms of reliability.
Any room for compromise here?
Stephen
[Bug 658] Web link to KDL source tarball is broken
I'll make a tag of the current revision and put that online also.
Ruben
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Stephen Roderick<kiwi [dot] net [..] ...> wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2009, at 08:59 , Ruben Smits wrote:
>
>> We will, if the api stabilizes. I recently filled the "dynamics" gap,
>> so a stable release is on its way.
>>
>> Ruben
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:16 PM, S Roderick<kiwi [dot] net [..] ...> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 05:16 , Ruben Smits wrote:
>>>> https://www.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=658
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...> changed:
>>>>
>>>> What |Removed |Added
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> CC| |ruben [dot] smits [..] ...en.b
>>>> | |e
>>>> Resolution| |FIXED
>>>> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- Comment #1 from Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...>
>>>> 2009-06-09 11:16:53 ---
>>>> I updated the kdl-source webpage. Only the kdl-svn will still be
>>>> available. The
>>>> tarball should be updated every day.
>>>
>>> So KDL will no longer have any fixed point releases? v1.0, v2.0, etc.
>>> Stephen
>
> Modifying the tarball everyday invaldiates the checksum for any
> package manager. :-(
>
> No chance of doing some kind of fixed point release? IMHO KDL is
> pretty damn stable in it's current form, both in terms of API and in
> terms of reliability.
>
> Any room for compromise here?
> Stephen
> --
> Orocos-Dev mailing list
> Orocos-Dev [..] ...
> http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev
>
[Bug 658] Web link to KDL source tarball is broken
You can find the tag-tarball at
http://people.mech.kuleuven.be/~rsmits/kdl/orocos-kdl-1.0.0-alpha-src.ta...
Ruben
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Ruben
Smits<ruben [dot] smits [..] ...> wrote:
> I'll make a tag of the current revision and put that online also.
>
> Ruben
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Stephen Roderick<kiwi [dot] net [..] ...> wrote:
>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 08:59 , Ruben Smits wrote:
>>
>>> We will, if the api stabilizes. I recently filled the "dynamics" gap,
>>> so a stable release is on its way.
>>>
>>> Ruben
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:16 PM, S Roderick<kiwi [dot] net [..] ...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 05:16 , Ruben Smits wrote:
>>>>> https://www.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=658
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...> changed:
>>>>>
>>>>> What |Removed |Added
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> CC| |ruben [dot] smits [..] ...en.b
>>>>> | |e
>>>>> Resolution| |FIXED
>>>>> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --- Comment #1 from Ruben Smits <ruben [dot] smits [..] ...>
>>>>> 2009-06-09 11:16:53 ---
>>>>> I updated the kdl-source webpage. Only the kdl-svn will still be
>>>>> available. The
>>>>> tarball should be updated every day.
>>>>
>>>> So KDL will no longer have any fixed point releases? v1.0, v2.0, etc.
>>>> Stephen
>>
>> Modifying the tarball everyday invaldiates the checksum for any
>> package manager. :-(
>>
>> No chance of doing some kind of fixed point release? IMHO KDL is
>> pretty damn stable in it's current form, both in terms of API and in
>> terms of reliability.
>>
>> Any room for compromise here?
>> Stephen
>> --
>> Orocos-Dev mailing list
>> Orocos-Dev [..] ...
>> http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev
>>
>